Skip to content
Monday, October 12, 2026
World Digital UK

Tetris Couldn't Succeed at The Game Awards — An Additional Classification Could Fix That

As any prominent prize-giving event draws close, one notices a clamor for the addition additional classifications to honor underappreciated efforts and delight the spirits of fans with niche passions.

Another commentator previously argued advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are board games, this being a dedicated supporter's campaign. However, I must insist when I prioritize just as with other blinkered fanatics, there's a strong justification backing this proposal remains most pressing and important of all. Here's the proposal: There should be a category for puzzle games.

Categorizing Game Types

Classifying creative works is not a science; opinions vary greatly, and typically start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. There’s a reason movie academies avoid this approach. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise within the realm of video games, that demonstrate such variety it's challenging to consider them one unified medium.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of interactive entertainment excellence to be recognized, and to ensure all game types to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

Leading game ceremonies currently feature award types recognizing Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these award types effectively encompass numerous genres, allowing placement for numerous titles.

This doesn't apply to brain-teasing titles. There’s simply nowhere for their placement. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, each quite distinct: the architectural riddles from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching from another release, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles from additional release. Which classification works between these six categories? Simply put, no category fits.

Recognition Challenges

Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles released every year that have no home during gaming ceremonies, if they accidentally match award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive Indie races.

  • A renowned logic title received no recognition in any category during that awards season
  • Another creative title was excluded that year
  • Well-received sorting experience got ignored recently
  • Limited numbers of puzzle games scraped into independent or mobile categories

Importance of Logic Titles

Commonly they're modest productions, however the design behind logic titles holds tremendous importance. Iconic mobile puzzle games rank among the most-played games in the world maintaining this status for many years.

The famous puzzle experience rivals well-known building titles claiming status as highest-selling title ever; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, and engaging with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Logic titles wouldn't face that issue. You could fill a field of five interesting, varied, worthy titles each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave many worthy titles.

Restating the point, these represent titles without proper classification in important events. Puzzle game makers are working at the demanding boundary of video game design, creating some of most fundamental forms of the video game form. Just like cinema stunt performers, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay decades.

Written by

Donald Wright

A tech journalist and digital strategist with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and their impact on society.

World Digital UK

Type to search articles.