A deadly train crash in the Mexican state of Oaxaca has caused the fatalities of at least 13 people, an incident expected to reignite critical opposition regarding the rapidity and management of the country's key public works projects.
The accident occurred on the Interoceanic Corridor train, a rail link built to connect the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific Ocean across the thinnest stretch of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. This project was created to offer an competing rail corridor to the Panama Canal, aimed at driving regional growth in the area.
“We shall meticulously determine the reasons behind this tragedy,” stated the national leader.
The official announced that, of the around 250 passengers on board, another 98 were hurt, with five of those in grave condition. The official stated plans to visit Oaxaca to speak with those impacted.
Flagship Project of Past Leadership
The Interoceanic Train was a signature public works project of the previous administration, whose presidency ended the previous year. This venture was a hallmark of his administration's developmental goals for the southeastern region.
Another massive railway undertaking from that time, a tourist and cargo loop around the Yucatán Peninsula, was also part of the wider plan to kickstart the economic fortunes of a comparatively disadvantaged part of the country.
Construction Oversight and Worries
The development of both rail lines was overseen by the army, marking a significant increase of its responsibilities in public projects. They were executed at an accelerated rate, beating predictions to be partially launched before the end of that government.
However, this accelerated timeline had also fueled ongoing questions over operational security.
- Sunday's accident was the third occurrence on the Interoceanic Train this year.
- This involves an prior collision this month when a train smashed into a truck at a level crossing.
- The other major rail project has also experienced two non-deadly derailments.
Demands for Audit and Pause
In the wake of the tragedy, the head of a major opposition party called for an prompt halt in the building and running of all comparable projects.
This pause was suggested pending a comprehensive technical review. The party stated that the situation "calls for immediate answers."
In response, the national leader asserted that the train had been running in full accordance with all operational standards. Commitments were given that the government would continue to be "responsible" in both the development and running of these strategic initiatives.